No one is killed or beheaded even after disrespecting the Hindu Gods, that’s the Sanskriti Hindus follow..!
06 Jul 2022 14:37:34
After Udaipur, Amravati also saw the brutal murder of a Hindu man because he supported Nupur Sharma. And then one after the other death threats, “Gustakh e nabi ki ek hi saza, sir tan se Juda” was still going viral on social media. And then comes to the “Disrespect of maa Kaali” video/poster of the new movie Kaali. Where she is shown smoking and drinking. Again Hindu sentiments were hurt. But have you seen anyone? Is any Hindu killing anyone? Or giving death threats? Leena Mainmekalai just like that insulted Hindu Goddess Kaali, and everyone is MUM.
It is not like they aren’t protective of their religion, it is about Killing someone, who is not their Sanskriti. TMC member Mahua Moitra said on the public platform that “To me, Maa kali is Meat-Eating, Alcohol accepting goddess.” Will Mamata Banerjee disown Mahua as BJP did to Nupur Sharma? A question every common man is asking.
Mahua said, “It is a freedom of speech and expression, that you have the freedom to imagine your goddess.” Now all the Hindus are asking only one question, “Why when it comes to freedom of expression it is directly related to hurting Hindu sentiments?”
If a particular religion is hurt because of Nupur Sharma’s statement, and if that ends up killing and beheading innocent people, can we consider, whether it is allowed in the definition of Freedom of speech and expression?
Kanhaiyalal and Umesh Kolhe are the symbols of how now Hindus are being treated and how no one is doing anything about this. Not even our supreme court, where judges are blaming Nupur Sharma for all that is happening in our country.
Take web shows like Leila, Patal Lok, and Tandav. Hindu gods and traditions are being insulted. Take movies like PK, Ludo, and A Suitable Boy, where Hindu sentiments were hurt, and no one came forward to speak about it? Is this the secularism we want in our country?
There was a time, when former defense minister Sushama Swarash boldly lashed out in the parliament and said, “For us, the definition of secularism is A good Hindu is a good Hindu, A good Mulsim is a Good Mulsim, a Good Sikh or Christian is a Good Sikh or Christian. And they all live together by respecting each other's religions and following their own. But sadly now in India the definition of secularism is demeaning and disrespecting Hindu sentiments, and government or no government we don’t accept this definition of secularism”
Sadly in the last 30-40 years, nothing has changed. We still are living in a world where a sad definition of secularism is existing and we are not able to do anything for the same.
Maa Kaali was disrespected, and Bengali or no Bengali no Hindu would accept this. Sentiments are sentiments and they are equal for everyone, for every religion. And if everyone takes a gun or a knife to fight this, the end of the world is near.
If one religion is taking the law in their hand, you can’t stop the other religion to do the same. Instead, when one is doing that, they must get punished.
Insulting Hindu Sentiments is the new definition of secularism and Hindus refused to take this. PERIOD.
What are your views about this? Let us know in the comments below.