BBC's out of tune reporting for Ram Lalla's Pran Pratishthapana attracts no momentum
On a not so surprising note, BBC has yet again willingly chosen to call the Ram Temple a "Controversial temple" by referring it to be built on the ruins of a razed mosque.
Total Views | 172
Author : - HIMALI NALAWADE, SHIVANI SHINDE
January 22nd 2024, on a historic day, it was a moment of 'Euphoria' for all 'Bharatiyas' as the 500-year-long struggle of Hindus finally concluded with 'Ram Lalla's Pran Pratishthapana' taking place in Ayodhya. However, some parts of the pseudo-secularists and media houses were reluctant to see the silver lining. Topping the list, the Colonial News Channel & loyalists of the British Royal Family, British Broadcasting Corporation, or BBC, have once again demonstrated blatant Hinduphobia with their anti-Bharat coverage of Pran Pratisthapana ceremony of Ram Lalla.
On a not so surprising note, BBC has yet again willingly chosen to call the Ram Temple a 'Controversial temple' by referring it to be built on the ruins of a razed mosque, the infamous Babri Masjid that Mughal emperor Babur had built by demolishing an already existing Ram temple.
While the colonial news channel attempted to 'sympathize' India's biggest minority, which according to WAQF Board data owns 6.1 LAKH acres of land in India, BBC once again tried to brand Indian Muslims as 'victims' of so-called 'Hindu atrocities', that according to BBC is being executed at the hands of the Indian government in today's date.
The BBC published an article titled, "Ayodhya Ram Mandir: India PM Modi inaugurates Hindu temple on razed Babri mosque site". Before claiming that the Hindu temple is build on razed Babri Mosque, BBC needs to take lessons of Indian History from Indian sources and not what Colonists wrote down as a propaganda under the name of 'History'. But why would BBC do that? So here's a reference of a British merchant's account of the same. William Finch, who was sent to Ayodhya for expedition by the East India Company between 1608 and 1611, also recorded the ruins of 'Ram Kot' and the bhakti of Hindus for the place, which being a christian he refers to as 'Hindu reverence for the site'.
16th Century:
— vivan. (@VivanVatsa) January 22, 2024
The first piece of evidence can be taken from the accounts of William Finch, a traveller who visited India around 1604 (or 1608). His observations, chronicled in a diary, offer a fascinating glimpse into the spiritual milieu of the time. The focal point of his… pic.twitter.com/sbAAM0xYgy
In his book, William, a British, mentioned that Hindus believed Ayodhya was 'Janmasthan' (birthplace) of Bhagwan Ram. He also wrote that people are coming to the banks of holy river Saryu and taking holy dips. Historians consider this account to be significant because it makes no mention of namaz and the presence of Muslims at the site, until then at least.
Apart from that, Historiographer William Foster's, who in is his book, "Early Travels in India" clearly describes Ayodhya and the structure of Hindu Ram temple existing in the city, indicating that it was not the mosque that was razed to build a Ram Temple but it happened the other way round. Several accounts of foreign travelers and British administrators also corroborated the destruction of the temple at Bhagwan Ram’s birthplace by a Mughal ruler.
Several accounts of foreign travelers and British administrators also corroborated the destruction of the temple at Ram’s birthplace by a Mughal ruler. Detailed sketches of the site were made by them. #AyodhyaHiddenFacts pic.twitter.com/JHRwWl2NJ7
— Amit Thadhani (@amitsurg) November 3, 2018
Further walking the path of Hindu hatred, BBC mentioned that the Pran Pratishthapana event has evoked fear and painful memories among Muslims in Ayodhya, which contradicts the common perception of the Pran Pratishthapana celebrations across India.
As that wasn't enough, to continue its longstanding attempts to shield Islamists and brand their radicals as victims, BBC further neglected the statement of the Indian Supreme Court, which was delivered on the basis of archaeological findings. BBC in its article mentions that "Many Hindus believe the Babri mosque was built by Muslim invaders on the ruins of a temple where the Hindu god was born."
It’s like Marxists think Indian history began when the Moguls & British invaded India. In typical fashion both @CBCNews and @BBC call it Hindu nationalism when India’s Hindu indigenous population stand up to colonial forces to take back its culture. 🤣. pic.twitter.com/8Yi0E9vOHv
— Patrick Brauckmann 🕉️ (@vonbrauckmann) January 23, 2024
Evidently, BBC tried to propagate that the tale of Ramayana is based on the Hindu Fantasy world and the extension of Ram Janmbhoomi Andolan is where fantasy meets fanaticism. However the official mouthpiece of the "British Royal Family" conveniently fails to even address the reports of a scientific excavation carried out by a team of proficient archaeologists headed by eminent archaeologist 'K. K. Muhammed'.
Going further, BBC that functions as per the Christian comprehension of religion, mocks the Hindu rituals saying, "Hindus believe that chanting mantras and performing rituals around a fire will infuse sacred life in an idol or a photograph of a deity."
Other than the news article targeting Hindu beliefs and potraying Ayodhya Ram Mandir as a symbol of Hindu Islamophobia , BBC in its Prime Time News reporting also termed 'Ram Temple' as a 'controversical' Hindu temple. It futher said this is nothing but a political stunt of the Narendra Modi Government ahead of the Lok Sabha election.
They further invited Arfa Khanum Sherwani , who is reputed as a pseudo-secular journalist, as an esteemed speaker for the Prime Time discussion. While sharing her unfounded and biased thoughts, she referred Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's involvement in the entire movement for Ram Janmabhoomi and his role for the Pran Pratishthapana of Ram Lallla, points out that India is not a democracy but a 'theocratic state'.A theocratic state refers to a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.
She futher said that Modi has tried to fundamentally change character of India from a secular society to a theocratic state. She conculded her thoughts saying Muslims of India had accepted court’s verdict but for many the temple will remain a symbol of injustice.
Was on BBC world-
— Arfa Khanum Sherwani (@khanumarfa) January 22, 2024
It’s a moment of triumph for Hindu majoritarianism.
Modi has tried to fundamentally change character of India from a secular society to a theocratic state.
Muslims of India had accepted court’s verdict but for many the temple will remain a symbol of injustice. pic.twitter.com/z8r8msPpu4
Considering the leftist and pro-Islamist radical links of the British news channel, it is understood why BBC would report the historic day of Jan 22, 2024 in such a dark manner. However, it is the innocent common people who have to pay the price of the British narrative of 'Divide & Rule', who might innocently believe their reports, that clearly lack research, even if it is to propagate false narrative.
--
Bharati Web
